No intention to see do extract here.
mmmm
2009-03-07 | Water Bo (Zhang Boting): denounced the heard people say that water not very clear. Some water resources development and utilization of water resources exist, such as: extraction of groundwater or irrigation water from the river is mentioned in the form of a development of water resources, water resources development that will use the same general of the developed water resources. Thus, the development of water resources and water resources are often confused. In addition, the construction of dams storing flood water damage as the variable construction of water reservoirs can also be said to be a water resources development. But this is only a reserve of water resources development, the development is intended to adjust the spatial and temporal distribution of water resources conflicts, improve water control and availability.
For both (with reserves of sexual and ) completely different water resources development, the so-called over-development of the argument is entirely different. In the first case, the so-called development is the use of excessive over itself, natural ecosystems will certainly cause greater harm. while in the second cases, the development is to improve the water reserves only, and can be controlled, can use the degree of function.
In addition, the use of reservoir storage water resources development is a form of power generation. strictly speaking, such a development of water resources development should be called water, but because of the lack of clear definition, the community of non-professionals are difficult to distinguish between water development and water resources development differences. even some significant level of staff on this issue inevitably absurd. For example; Beijing in 2004, And one of the power sector from a head of policy research institutions, even the error evaluation of hydropower development in China can not exceed 40% of the internationally recognized water resource utilization. This is because the electricity sector, water resources policy researchers confused The concept of development and hydropower development. Not only that, even if some water experts, and sometimes talked as shown in hydropower development and water resources development of the concept of fuzzy. Of course, this problem can not blame the concept of someone . In fact, we did not water sector water resource development has been strictly defined, and, according to conventional reasoning, of course, water resources, water resources should belong to a part of it, it was the water resources development, understood as the water resource development also seems logical.
hh if we can avoid claims of excessive use of water resources development, and direct use of water use, the use of excessive claims, to resolve the current series may be the best way to confuse the concept. careful analysis our current variety of .
Also, avoid excessive use of water resources development of fuzzy argument, but also to prevent the extreme environmental organizations at home and abroad over the so-called developed for this reason, the normal line interference in developing countries the implementation of hydropower construction. For example; 2006 to meet the world's 14th World Water Day, the upcoming United Nations China Morning Post article a from Africa to China's Yellow River Nile and the Colorado River in the United States, are faced with dry water or even stop the embarrassing situation.
should be said that due to global climate change hydrology in some areas caused by abnormal, and with the human civilization needs and population increases, there are indeed many large river basin water supply and demand has been very prominent. However, the report cited by the three rivers, precisely because people's efforts, the river dried up to avoid a successful example. hh
Objectively speaking, the dam itself does not consume water, the dam was built, but for the people's production and living, water, water provides a convenient and possible. These three rivers not only not a It means successful use of engineering to solve the contradictions of uneven spatial and temporal distribution of water resources, while ensuring the social section of this demand, but also to prevent the river dried up.
few days later, the official promulgation of the 2006 Resources Report : Despite the uneven distribution of Earth's fresh water resources, they still put on enough. However, mismanagement, lack of resources, environmental change, and inadequate investment in infrastructure makes about one-fifth of the world's people lack access to safe drinking water, 40% people lack basic sanitation. . solve the world's water problems, we must accelerate the development and construction of water conservancy facilities necessary (of course including dams, canals).
In addition, the more than 20 million people in developing countries lack reliable energy, and water is an important resource for creating energy. European development and utilization of 75% of the water resources. However, in Africa, 60% of people still do not have electricity, water resources development rate is very low. Construction of disinformation propaganda and the countries need development and construction of water conservancy and hydropower. In this case, our publicity department, especially the leaders, experts, if not an accurate representation of the problem of excessive water use, and simplified as social needs. It is because of a series of dams and water conservancy facilities, our human existence to solve the spatial and temporal distribution of water resources uneven and sharp conflicts. And only through these series of water conservancy facilities, our people can achieve water resource management, allocation, to meet the development needs of human society while protecting the river ecosystem.
China is still a developing country, is also a serious shortage of water conservancy facilities, in order to protect our social and economic development and environmental protection We also face the daunting task of Water Resources and Hydropower Development facilities. In order to build water conservancy and hydropower in China to create a good public opinion environment, we recommend cautious or the use of) excessive,
very regrettable that the current conservative mistake as ecological protection of ecological environment of extreme thoughts, has affected some of our environmentalists, and even environmental protection officials. have led some environmentalists to the first class of environmental change issues requirements are too harsh, and therefore, has inevitably led to the deterioration of the second class of environmental problems. For example, demanding the construction of the dam is bound to hinder the development of hydropower resources in China, so that the extent of China's hydropower development has less than 20%. as to meet basic energy needs of social development, we have a lot of burning coal, resulting in serious environmental pollution problems in China is difficult to solve. more extreme environmental groups, the manipulation by foreign forces, not only for our country turn a blind eye to serious environmental pollution problems, but is very keen to oppose the dams (and other kinds of economic development) activities. that we are a lot of areas, environmental pollution problems have been very serious, still lingering. It should be said when these extreme environmentalists, organizations shouting people are always using a variety of media to mislead the public, hydropower development and environmental protection advocates there are irreconcilable contradictions. In fact this concept, there is no distinction between what is ecological protection, what is the eco-conservative and some not so often talking about science, do not speak conservative approach of ecological rationality, wrongly touted as eco-protection measures, sought after, but the end result often backfire with the goal of ecological protection.
conservative advocate of ecological some from those who are often developed countries (or regions) enough to live comfortably in the extreme environmentalists. They often like to use the . For example, to oppose China's Nu River hydropower development, extreme poverty, environmental organizations ignore the urgent requirements of the development of the Nu people desire, they hesitate to vigorously rumors, not suitable to the extreme poor farming Nu, portrayed from the real world, the original ecological river. Once upon a time the deception of false propaganda of the National public, lied to state leaders, and even deceive the United Nations agencies. Even after the rumor was exposed, in order to hinder the development of the Nu River, they are still the one hand, smear attacks in the Nu River downstream downstream countries The Salween decision on the construction of large hydropower stations, while they are still using domestic and foreign organizations in series with the anti-dam, spreading rumors to incite, in turn, create the downstream countries oppose the Nu River Hydropower Development in China all the illusion. In short, They have been using a variety of opportunities for unscrupulous provoke international conflicts in the Nu River hydropower development obstacles.
we can say that the lack of overall concept, the local ecological changes on the ground, blindly oppose the so-called environmentally friendly hydropower development is a species of narrow ecological conservative, it can be said to engage in an extreme environment, or the pseudo-environment. either from solving the most important environmental issue of water resources, or reduce energy emissions from the perspective of the scientific development of hydropower are protected China's ecological environment, the best choice.
mmmmmm
. When the abuse of public interest litigation who really hurt? [July 14]
polite to say that this is some extreme environmentalists due to their own scientific knowledge limitations, can not distinguish between sustainable development and the difference between predatory development, some economic development of normal behavior as water, land, mineral resources, the destruction.
Frankly speaking, there are some extreme environmental carrying foreign funding organizations guy, with ulterior motives to use the name of public interest litigation to achieve their obstruction, interference, damage to the normal development of national purpose. For example, the question about the Nu River Hydropower Development is the case.
is well known that the development community debate on the Nu River already is not a new topic. Back in September 2003, Thought approved anti-dam experts and scholars convened comment cards will be Nu ring, creating a series of eco-Nu Jiang false statement. and in particular the cooperation of news media workers in the community set off a so-called ; reserved Original Nu Jiang April 2005 Lu Youmei, Zuoxiu academicians, Fang, PhD, a group of experts and scholars visit the Nu River, after the report by the University and the Yunnan Province to the Central Authorities, before demonizing the Nu River to reverse this situation.
, however, Since the case of the Nu River has been verified, the extreme environmentalists turn began to demand the right to know what the EIA report and publicity Nu .2005 August 25, in the last two years After the truth, in some NGO organizations and extremist environmentalists organizing and planning, some environmental organizations and individuals sent a letter to the national authorities, Planning a state secret can not be publicized, in order to meet the people's right to know requirements of environmental protection, However, environmentalists are nothing but information asymmetry as grounds for refusing to attend the meeting.
Obviously, those who concocted an open letter to a real interest in what is simply not right, but the Nu River plan is to use the characteristics of a state secret, intends to create a procedural obstacles. Even so, to the general public, experts or in the water after writing an open letter to the environmentalists, a comprehensive reply and clarification (see). All in all, after a long debate , the Nu River Hydropower Development in the conclusions of the issues has been very clear that the Nu River Hydropower Development is development and ecological protection of the Nu River area the best choice.
Recently, however, as the subject of public interest litigation in the community of warming, some Beijing environmental NGO in Beijing and individual lawyers in a law firm, announced its re-inventiveness to the so-called State Environmental Protection Administration's administrative proceedings like. Bureau in conjunction with the National Development and Reform Commission, on the Nu River Hydropower Plan Environmental Impact Report review and the behavior of the formation of opinions and results of the review, in violation of . quashing the complaint requested review comments, and The reason must be reliable, but written in the public interest litigation plaintiffs state the facts and reasons to convince you people?
hard to understand is that these plaintiffs carried away, his feast of a residential district in Beijing and engaged in high-sounding Nu thousands of kilometers away to hinder the people, to save their poor water resources development and application of the Nu River.
Is the Nu River water, which can only leave you with nothing to eat all day long Sir Miss who in their leisure time to enjoy sightseeing, but not along the Nu River people who make the development and application?
when the plaintiff stressed when their constitutional civil rights, to not think, in your own home to Beijing's high-rise buildings, drinking the convenience of tap water when you so confidently assert the rights of citizens of the Nu River water resources, on the Nu River for hundreds of thousands of people, you are not really too high?
not forget that in any point, you must Nu River people should not be any more than the noble place. If you allow the abuse complaint, the Nu River people why can not enjoy the same rights? Indeed, civil rights of any person should also be limited, and any time you are not eligible, no reason to deprive the people of the Nu Nu River water resources development and utilization and survival, the right to development.
these extreme environmentalists, not only blatant interference, deprived of the right to survival and development of the Nu River people, but also like to sow dissension between the interests of the people to the Nu on behalf of itself.
, however, ironic that, although in some countries have decided to hydropower development in the region, they are often able to use the masses of immigrants relocation compensation and yet more psychological, create some conflicts. However, since countries have Nu River region has not decided to hydropower development, so they currently can not find a provocative, the use of immigration conflict.
In fact, these extreme environmentalists are people who do not have to blame the ignorance of the Nu River, do not complain about their party and the government too trust. in fact, have their own independent-minded people by no means the Nu River, but you do not dare to face.
There was one old comrades told me that the national liberation have been 50 years, but why do we the people of the Nu River still living in the slash and burn the original state? over our country are poor, no money for development and construction on the Nu River, we can still understand. But today, when some developed regions have to drive the economy, but when a big headache, because some of hostility to China development of pseudo-environmentalists who create rumors and delays in approval of our countries on the Nu River people development and use of local natural resources, does not allow us to shake off poverty status? like executive decision-making power is it the people do?
mmmmmm < br>. the face of the dam was built more or less flooding? [July 28]
. Three Gorges Dam, water pollution has been made under it? [July 21]
mmmmmm
. [science and technology concerns ] Also on Army Interview Weekly is one of the most strange a name, selected the reason is because he wrote a book m throw up dirt rm a l China's first public database of water pollution in China Water Pollution Map l r. As a water professional and technical personnel, and always on Today, when Mr. Ma Jun was selected Time magazine and was elected after the annual green figures, I am still willing to repeat word for word, I was the evaluation of this book.
----- 1998, after the flood, the National down and work hard to feel the afforestation to reduce soil and water conservation needs to be emphasis on the importance of the flood, Mr. Ma Jun seize the opportunity to express, is indeed the mainstream consciousness of society at that time, Mr. Ma Jun has so famous. I read that book, Mr. Ma Jun did spend a lot of time to gather historical data, I think it is a good reference information on water compilation. However, despite access to a wealth of information, I feel restricted by many factors, Mr. Ma Jun is essentially not a water expert, you can say with certainty that his fame as the mainstream of scientific thought from the perspective of water is problems. However, out of respect for a variety of academic thought, I provide a lot of information from a book perspective, the book gives some recognition. But the fame immediately after Mr. Ma Jun of the Construction of the dam as the representative of the opposition to water conservancy is very debatable.
hh that planting trees to restore the original ecosystem to be able to cure the flooding, is also a naive illusion. if this is to deny the role of all human works , it is ridiculous. From this point of view, I can say with certainty that the conclusions of Ma is problematic, the information provided, nor can it reflect the true history.
on flood control project against all other measures, even more mistake. We have enough time to reflect on the past, we must pay attention to the appropriate level, we must pay attention to facts, not always to raise himself to say nothing of the past . In fact our human understanding, is a cumulative process, we humans never be confused to fight, destroy the natural level. but once we had the great achievements of human transformation of nature, dazzled, too high estimated the human capacity, expressed a desire beyond the realistic possibility. Based on this desire, we made it, in addition to not achieve the intended purpose, almost nothing else can be said to be blamed.
in flood control issues, we have never denied the role of forest soil and water conservation, and we had never forgotten the role of the lake detention. emerged over the past deforestation, reclaimed land from various mistakes, but in the tremendous economic and population pressures We made a forced choice. a lot of the past is insufficient, not that we do not know, but in the social reality of the helplessness of the face of pressure. And some scholars, always like to play the role of hindsight, with the negative yesterday all the way to show their brilliant. more terrible muddle draw some wrong conclusions, affecting the development of society .-------< br> hh
Finally, he said water crisis experts changed, but the issue of hydropower development in his views consistent. l I do not oppose the dam, but not any of the canyon is a natural dam. r Ma was not satisfied with doubts. In fact, water is not without challenge Bo. in the water Ma Bo the article in question has been clear that the facts relied upon to. that is in the , on the Three Gorges construction is not belong to the company's illegal to work on issues, Mr. Ma Jun to position. for each specific dam projects, they will without exception, said: I do not oppose construction of dams, however, is to oppose the construction of the dam you are now.
In addition, Mr. Ma Jun said that the any of the canyon is a natural dam, development, and the current level of hydropower development in China can be developed only for the economic level of about 1 / 4. Now each of a large hydropower dam site, almost all generations of water through our experts have given us in the nature of water energy resources of hundreds of dams in the canyon can be repeatedly screened out.
tell the truth there is no suspense for the election to Mr. Ma Jun green figure, much more than the joy of my worries. Now the reason I put these concerns say, I hope to discuss with you. Ma comrades, environmental issues in-depth attention, let us in the scientific, rational discussion, promoting China's socialist construction and the normal development of eco-environmental protection.
mmmmmmm
. [technology] from the members of the National Anti-water view upgrade scientific quality long way to go [March 15]
mmmmmmm
. environmental protection cause the moon, the circle must be better than China? [April 6]
read One of the Qiang online interview on the magazine's introduction, quite a few feelings.
recent issues of magazines published on a continuous theme of the river, cause me great interest. editor as a non-engineering staff, so ; reports on the some errors and flawed ; Rhone River Power Plant, Our Dujiangyan, Rhone River is a Shuanghe structure, there is always a canal in, the canal is not parallel, but braid the same series together, the Rhone River has 19 power stations, the most of it is fully developed, all of his development of hydropower potential has been largely completed, it is all channels of the river Rhone why I think it worthy of our study Chinese, because it is very much like Dujiangyan, which is the case, for example, it is time to build a power station , it is not in the original construction of power stations on the river, because the original river channel is a natural, he was in the river next to the excavation of an artificial canal, should the power station built in the artificial canal mm Unlike our Gezhouba and Three Gorges. The Shuanghe structure, is primarily a result of power plant construction needs. If you look carefully, will see China's Three Gorges Hydroelectric Station and the construction of the dam site, there is a Jiangxinzhou island, which can be said to flow in large rivers the repair station, to ensure smooth flow of the river, under the premise necessary to stage construction. Not all rivers are able to find easily built dam. French Rhone absence of such a condition, so, in a river bend , first power station built a new river channel and then cut out with water, and built a Shuanghe structure. Its main role is to facilitate the construction of power stations. Shuanghe structure equivalent to the role of a little island Jiangxinzhou the Yangtze River in China, to the river separating the points of construction. Of course, river straightening, the Rhone River to improve power plant efficiency will be certain. In contrast, it should be said that the construction of the Three Gorges water conservancy experts and Gezhouba way more intelligent than the French or the more fortunate because we find and use natural a layman's praise, and scientific planning of hydropower stations, clever construction, and have actually become a disadvantage.
do not understand the level of the dam as science fiction
feeling of experiences and lessons learned, for example, the Rhone River which I feel is basically a low dam was built the dam, few very high dam was built, construction of high dams have a very great harm, the harm is not to build a dam to be recognition that We can only see its benefits, is that large power generation, flood control capacity, irrigation water and more, but it is also very significant harm, the simplest is the immigration issue, it is to drown large areas of land, your dam height, For example, I asked a man in France, because I see this place to build the dam, a good dam site, the place Why do not you build a dam, such as the construction of more than 100 meters of the dam. He said the construction of such dam, the whole plain is gone, the French to build five or six such dams, the whole of France is gone, he did not want to build more dams to flood more land. dam, low dam problem, not as understanding as of the actual situation of different dam or low dam construction. However, under normal circumstances, a basin at least one (relatively) high dam (large library), increased ability to regulate the cascade hydropower stations. It was built in the river is called the planning leading reservoir, only to have built the leading performance of more reservoir regulation in order to make the whole power station the river flood control, power generation efficiency have played out, this is the general law of river development. Select the dam, low dam is not even ...
No comments:
Post a Comment